Inside the Supreme Court

Like most lawyers, and many other Americans, I find the U.S. Supreme Court both fascinating and mysterious. Books, Crooks & Counselors discusses the high court’s operations in the “Trial & Error” chapter, and explores the more personal side of judging in the chapter “Thinking Like a Judge.” The newest justice, Elena Kagan, touched on both topics, and how the judges go about making a decision, in a recent speech at Marquette University, reported by Alan Borsuk on the Marquette University Law School blog. Definitely worth a look. 

Of particular interest is the care and time given to what are admittedly lesser cases–and the reasons why they sometimes require more debate than the more significant decisions. I also appreciated her comments on the role of oral argument, and on passion. 

Justice Scalia may think he’s the first judge with an antelope head in his chambers. He’s not. In the mid 1980s, I was in the offices of a Pierce County, Washington Superior Court judge in Tacoma. A beautiful pronghorn mount hung above the judge’s desk, sporting a pair of Groucho Marx glasses. Nice touch, don’t you think?

writing about legal issues ,

a hometown article and a happy review

The Bigfork Eagle reports on my Agatha win, and Bellaonline gives Books, Crooks and Counselors a lovely review!

Books Crooks and Counselors, Uncategorized , ,

Dr. Betty Kuffel discusses pedophiles

My friend Dr. Betty Kuffel was interviewed last week on Montana Public Radio about her book, Eyes of a Pedophile.  Right click on this link. Then click on “Open Link in New Window.” It will open as a download audio clip.

 

Betty writes from her long experience as an emergency room doctor, and from her extensive interviews with one of Montana’s most infamous pedophiles. Her book includes advice on identifying child predators and protecting children from them.

References for Writers , , ,

Characters: The shocking case of the embezzler among us

You’ve probably seen the headlines in your own paper: “46-year-old woman arrested for embezzlement.” “Long-time bank branch manager facing charges.” And so on.

Seems like a regular feature in the local papers: A trusted employee, usually a middle-aged woman, is charged with embezzling a few thousand, or a few hundred thousand, dollars from her long-time employer. The employer had had suspicions, but couldn’t imagine any of his or her employees actually doing such a thing. Or the employer just thought business was tough and everyone had to work harder.

That trend caught the eye of a Missoulian reporter, who earlier this year interviewed security consultants and others who study patterns of criminal behavior. The article explores motivations, gender differences, and methods. A companion story provides tips on preventing embezzlement.

Why women? Opportunity, it seems. Women work as bank tellers and branch managers, as court clerks and office managers. They have easy access to cash, sometimes lots of it. And embezzlement is not a violent crime. It doesn’t require body size, strength, or a weapon.

They’re ordinary women, in most cases. I knew the credit union branch manager who embezzled nearly $700,000 and staged her own disappearance. Saw her every week or two for years when I did my banking. Always friendly, married, loved to chat about her kids’ sporting events. I never would have imagined her a big-time thief.

Another embezzler I knew was a repeat offender. She told the second employer about her previous conviction, explaining that she’d taken money to enable herself to leave a bad marriage and support her children on her own. She’d done her penance. But then, she abused her second chance, embezzling more than $200,000 over several years. Why? As far as I could tell, it stemmed from envy of her employer’s financial security, a desire to travel and give her children gifts, possibly including business start-up money, and a belief that he wouldn’t notice–or would be reluctant to prosecute. And of course, she got away with it for years. Her own parents shunned her. She went to prison.  But when I ran into her in K-Mart a year or more after her release, she looked like the average woman down the street.

And that’s the advantage these criminals have: they don’t fit our image of criminals. As a writer, you can use that advantage, too.

writing about legal issues , ,

Malice Afterthought

Indulge me, please, in one more photo blog:

Six Guppy Agatha nominees: Daryl Wood Gerber (Best Short Story), Kaye George, Janet Bolin, and Rochelle Staab (all for Best First), Krista Davis (Best Short Story) and me (Best Nonfiction).

 

 

With Beth Groundwater and Liz Zelvin

 

 

 

With three other Best Nonfiction nominees: John Curran, AB (Barbara) Emrys, and Charlaine Harris. Michael Dirda joined us Saturday for the panel discussion and awards dinner.

(Thanks to all the friends who shared photos of such a memorable weekend: Dana Cameron, Janet Bolin, Liz Zelvin, Robin Templeton, Gigi Pandian, Sandra Parshall, and Dru Ann Love.)

Books Crooks and Counselors , , , , , , , , , ,

More Malicious Photos

We’ll get back to the law next week. Meanwhile, it’s all about me — and Malice Domestic.

 

Celebrating with my Guppy sisters, Kendel Flaum, Hank Phillipi Ryan, Diane Valleri, and Gigi Pandian.  

 

 

 

 

Six of the nine Guppies nominated for Agathas: Avery Aames (aka Daryl Wood Gerber), Kaye George, Krista Davis (in front), Janet Bolin, Rochelle Staab, and me.

 

                                         With Debra Goldstein. 

 

 

 

With Chris Grabenstein, winner of the 2011 Agatha for Best Children’s/Young Adult, who also presented the Best Nonfiction Award.

 

 

 

 

 

 

With Jenny Milchman and Robin Templeton.

Books Crooks and Counselors , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

An Agatha Award Winner!

Now I know why so many people love Malice Domestic, the annual convention celebrating the traditional mystery.

From start to finish, a terrific con — and yes, I thought that even before the Agatha Awards! I was truly stunned to win. With such an amazing group of nominees — Charlaine Harris, AB (Barbara) Emrys, John Curran, and Michael Dirda — I’m deeply honored. 

A big thanks to everyone who’s read, bought, reviewed, and talked about Books, Crooks & Counselors. Your support means the world to me. Come on by, and I’ll pour you a cup of tea from a very special pot.

 

(Thanks to Liz Zelvin for the photo.)

Books Crooks and Counselors ,

Bidding time — Brenda Novak Auction for Diabetes Research

May 1 brings the start of NY Times bestselling author Brenda Novak’s Annual Online Auction for Diabetes Research. Bid on literally hundreds of items for readers and writers, including a signed copy of Books, Crooks & Counselors, the 2011 Agatha Award winner for Best Nonfiction, and two hours of legal research for a manuscript or two hours of manuscript review by the author of said Agatha winner, aka me.

Join the fun for a great cause!

 

Books Crooks and Counselors , ,

Malice afoot!

I’m off to Malice Domestic, the annual convention celebrating the traditional mystery, just outside Washington, D.C.  As some of you know, Books, Crooks & Counselors is nominated for an Agatha Award for Best Nonfiction. I know it’s hard to write with your fingers crossed, so cross them for me metaphorically!

Books Crooks and Counselors ,

A story with story potential

 A recent article in the Daily Inter Lake in Kalispell, Montana illustrates several legal matters useful to writers — a bench warrant for an arrest of a defendant who failed to appear for a court hearing, the use of bail to assure appearance, and how private investigators follow leads to track a fugitive who’s left the state – all in search of a character who tells a not-uncommon story.

Okay, so maybe “this is all because I protested a proposed copper and silver mine” isn’t exactly a common excuse. To my ears, it sounds like a slightly more creative than usual version of “not my fault.”

Especially because the suspect apparently did a similar runner before – for six years.

I’d say the chances of the judge setting bail at a level anywhere near what he can post are two: slim, and none.

What do you think?

writing about legal issues , ,